← Home · Roadway

Flexible Pavement Design for Orlando’s Karst and Sandy Subgrade

Together, we solve the challenges of tomorrow.

DISCOVER →

Flexible pavement design in Orlando requires more than a standard AASHTO 1993 catalog selection. The city sits on a complex stratigraphy of Pleistocene sands, silty sands, and the underlying Ocala Limestone—a karst formation that introduces sinkhole risk across Orange County. With an average annual rainfall of 53 inches and a water table that can rise to within a few feet of the surface during the wet season, subgrade moisture conditions dominate the structural response of any asphalt pavement. Our approach integrates in-situ permeability testing early in the investigation to quantify drainage capacity, and we often pair it with CBR road testing to establish a resilient modulus baseline before selecting layer thicknesses. The Florida Department of Transportation Flexible Pavement Design Manual guides layer coefficients, but the real value comes from interpreting local subgrade variability—something you only learn by drilling Orlando’s soils project after project.

A pavement structural number is only as reliable as the subgrade resilient modulus it rests on—and in Orlando, that modulus changes with every summer thunderstorm.

Method and coverage

Orlando’s subgrade typically consists of A-3 and A-2-4 soils per AASHTO classification, with clean fine sands dominating the near-surface. These materials drain quickly in the lab but can lose bearing capacity when saturated in the field if lateral drainage is constrained. We’ve measured field CBR values as low as 3 percent in poorly drained pockets near the Conway chain of lakes, while well-drained sites east of the airport often exceed 12 percent. A proper flexible pavement design here hinges on matching the structural number to the seasonal moisture regime. The grain-size analysis helps identify gradation gaps that could lead to pumping under repeated traffic loads, while the Atterberg limits confirm the absence of plastic fines—critical because even 10 percent silt content can transform a stable sand into a moisture-sensitive subgrade. Our laboratory operates under AASHTO R18 accreditation, and every pavement design recommendation includes a sensitivity analysis for the upper and lower bounds of the anticipated water table position, something the standard FDOT design tables don’t explicitly capture for localized conditions.
Flexible Pavement Design for Orlando’s Karst and Sandy Subgrade
Technical reference image — Orlando

Regional considerations

A recent warehouse project near the Sand Lake Road corridor illustrates what can go wrong without Orlando-specific flexible pavement design. The original plans specified 4 inches of asphalt over 8 inches of limerock base, with no geotechnical investigation beyond a standard soil survey. Within 18 months, alligator cracking appeared across the truck loading bays. Core samples revealed the base course had been contaminated by fine sand pumping upward through the open-graded limerock—the water table had risen 18 inches above the design assumption during an unusually wet September. The repair required full-depth reclamation, installation of a geotextile separator, and 12 inches of dense-graded base. The lesson: Orlando’s shallow water table and uniform sands demand a filter-compatible base layer or a separation fabric. We now specify geotextile separation on every flexible pavement design where the seasonal high groundwater is within 3 feet of the subgrade surface, and we verify base course gradation against FHWA filtration criteria before approving the mix.

Need a geotechnical assessment?

Reply within 24h.

Email: contact@geotechnicalengineering1.sbs

Process video

Technical parameters

ParameterTypical value
Design traffic (ESALs)0.5–30 million (arterial to collector)
Subgrade resilient modulus (Mr)4,500–11,000 psi (field CBR 3–12%)
Asphalt concrete modulus350,000–450,000 psi (PG 76-22 binder)
Granular base thickness6–12 inches (limerock or crushed concrete)
Drainage coefficient (mi)0.80–1.00 (quality of drainage fair to good)
Design reliability85–95% (urban arterial standard)
Sinkhole activity classificationZone B–C (moderate to low incidence)

Complementary services

01

AASHTO 1993 & MEPDG Pavement Design

Layer thickness and structural number analysis for new construction and rehabilitation overlays, incorporating Orlando-specific subgrade resilient modulus values from laboratory testing and seasonal moisture adjustment factors per FDOT guidelines.

02

Subgrade Evaluation & Drainage Design

Field CBR testing, in-situ density verification via sand cone, and permeability assessment to support pavement drainage layer design. Includes geotextile separation and edge drain recommendations for high-water-table sites common across Orange County.

Standards that apply

AASHTO 1993 Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design (MEPDG), FDOT Flexible Pavement Design Manual (Topic 625-010-002), ASTM D1883 / AASHTO T 193 (CBR testing), AASHTO R18 (laboratory accreditation)

Top questions

What is the typical flexible pavement cross-section for an Orlando collector road?

For a collector road with 5–10 million ESALs and a subgrade CBR of 5–7%, a typical Orlando cross-section includes 5–6 inches of asphalt concrete (structural course plus friction course) over 10–12 inches of limerock base, with an optional 6-inch stabilized subgrade layer if the in-situ sand is particularly loose. The structural number usually falls between 4.5 and 5.5. These numbers assume a drainage coefficient of 0.90–1.00 and 90% design reliability.

How does Orlando’s high water table affect flexible pavement performance?

A shallow water table reduces the effective stress in the subgrade, which directly lowers the resilient modulus. In Orlando, where the water table can rise to within 2–3 feet of the surface during summer, we apply a seasonal damage analysis that weights the reduced modulus across wet months. Without this adjustment, a pavement designed for dry conditions can lose 30–40% of its fatigue life. We also verify that the base course is free-draining and specify edge drains when the pavement section is in cut or adjacent to retention ponds.

Do you account for sinkhole risk in flexible pavement design?

Yes—sinkhole activity is a reality in Orange County, classified by the Florida Geological Survey as Zone B (moderate incidence). For flexible pavement design, we don’t design the pavement structure to span a sinkhole, but we do incorporate raveling mitigation: we specify a geogrid-reinforced base layer in areas mapped within 500 feet of known subsidence features, and we require compaction verification to 98% modified Proctor density to reduce the likelihood of small voids collapsing under traffic. For high-risk zones, we may recommend a CPT test to detect low-density pockets before construction.

What laboratory tests are required for a flexible pavement design package?

A complete Orlando flexible pavement design package typically includes grain-size analysis (ASTM D422/D6913), Atterberg limits (ASTM D4318), modified Proctor compaction (ASTM D1557), laboratory CBR (ASTM D1883), and resilient modulus testing (AASHTO T307) for high-traffic projects. We also run sulfate content tests on the subgrade and base materials because some Orlando limerock sources have shown elevated sulfate levels that can attack asphalt binders over time.

How much does a flexible pavement design study cost in Orlando?

The cost for a flexible pavement design study in Orlando typically ranges from US$1,630 to US$5,380, depending on the number of borings, the laboratory testing program required, and whether the project includes a full MEPDG analysis or a simpler AASHTO 1993 design. A residential subdivision with 4–6 borings and basic CBR testing falls at the lower end; an arterial road with resilient modulus testing, seasonal monitoring, and drainage analysis reaches the upper end.

Location and service area

We serve projects across Orlando and its metropolitan area.

View larger map